Changing the Conversation Around GE Crops

Recently the National Academy of Sciences released its study on the safety of food coming from genetically engineered crops. The report concluded that genetically modified organisms cause no more health problems for people than other foods. This was not a surprise for many agriculture who rely on science and fact to prove the safety of genetically engineered crops.
Cooperative Extension Specialist at the University of California-Davis Dr. Alison Van Eenennaam says that perhaps focusing on common shared values with consumers when discussing genetically engineered crops may be beneficial. She says the virus-resistant papaya is a great example of positive outcome of the technology.
VanEenennaam: “ I think that fits in with the sustainability goals that many people hold which is to trying to improve productivity and decrease the use of chemicals in agricultural production. So those type of stories try and tease apart some of the other concerns people have around multi-national corporations and talk about the fact that this is a breeding method that can be used for many different purposes. In fact the data showed that insect-resistance crops have had a tremendous impact on reducing the use of insecticide. That is a goal that many people support also. Those type of stories of how we are using the technology rather than focusing on what the technology is and the benefits that have come from existing uses and potential future benefits I think we can change the discussion a little and focus on how we are using it and what problems have been solved using the technology.”