Ban Unlikely To Hurt Ag

Ban Unlikely To Hurt Ag

Ban Unlikely To Hurt Ag. I'm Greg Martin with today's Line On Agriculture.

It was meant as a retaliatory response to sanctions but a week after the one-year ban on U.S. agricultural products by Russia that could bring higher prices to Russian consumers, should have little ill effect on U.S. agriculture. American Farm Bureau Economist Veronica Nigh says Russia Ranked 20th on our export list last year when American exports to Russia totaled about $1.3 billion.

NIGH: But that only accounted for about 1 percent of total sales. The bigger impact is on the Russian consumer. Russia imports about 40 percent of its food and we're predicting shortages and price hikes because the U.S. and the E.U. have been the primary suppliers to the Russian market because we offer a wider variety of food at a lower cost.

The ban on U.S. and E.U. products includes all meat, fish, dairy, fruits and vegetables. Nigh says the U.S. poultry industry will see the biggest hit.

NIGH: In 2013 we exported about $303 million worth of poultry meat to the Russian market. Russia is the U.S. poultry industry's second-largest market, so they'll be scrambling for a while to find new markets for that product.

She says in many ways the announcement by Russia reminds farmers of the 1980s grain embargoes.

NIGH: But a lot has changed in U.S. agricultural exports since that time. U.S. farmers and ranchers and the companies that sell their products have worked very hard to diversify their market. So in the case of Russia imposing a ban, isn't going to have nearly as large of an impact on U.S. farmers as it may have in the past.

That's today's Line On Agriculture. I'm Greg Martin on the Ag Information Network.

Previous ReportHigh Beef Prices
Next ReportDroning On